industry
Track approval conditions and surface current procedures.
Approval conditions are written locally, but tracking them is a shared discipline. ISO 14001, revised in April 2026, asks you to know your compliance obligations, including the conditions attached to your permits, and to check you're meeting them. IEC 62443 covers the security of operational technology, and the 2025 joint principles from cyber agencies in seven countries ask critical-infrastructure operators to test AI in operational technology continuously. We build a register of every condition, each linked to its source clause, and an assistant that answers only from current procedures. Your own regulators set the conditions; we make them easy to check.
Which rules apply to you is your compliance or legal team's call. We map our evidence to them; we don't certify against them.
In Australia, the regulator records approval holders who failed to publish annual compliance reports, implement approved management plans or report non-compliance.
One register where every condition links to its page, with the error rate measured before anyone relies on it.
Approval & Permit Conditions Register
SOP & Work-Instruction Assistant
Shift-Handover & Field-Report
SOCI AI Risk Evidence Australia
Sources
Lead solutions
One collection of SOPs, work instructions and OEM manuals for one site, line or crew, reached on the web. Answers show the step and page used, can come in the language the worker asks in with the English step alongside, and say so when the procedure is silent.
1–3 vendor tools tested before you sign, side by side, on your own content and questions, in accounts your organisation controls.
Turns each condition of a resources, energy or utilities approval into a register row linked to its page, starting with a Two-Week Trial on one approval.
Maps each AI use a utility or energy business runs to the relevant CIRMP rule items, and gives its risk team the data-flow maps, access lists and test reports behind each finding.
If your procedures already live in Mitti (by SafetyCulture), try its AI Assistant first. We build for the manuals and work instructions outside it.
Illustrative scenario: not a client engagement
Problem
A fictional mid-tier miner holds two approvals for one project, and its environment lead rebuilds a conditions spreadsheet whenever a plan changes.
Approach
The system reads the approvals without changing them, turns each condition into a row linked to its page, and sends unclear rows to the environment lead.
How we'd measure
What ships first
A draft register for one approval, with page links and its error rate.
At the go/no-go in week two, you decide whether to continue. If you stop, you keep the draft register, the answer key and the test results.
Australia is our home market and the one we know best.
Works alongside
| Obligation | What it means for an AI system | How we design for it | Evidence you get | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIRMP Rules ss 6(d) and 7(1)(b)–(c): sensitive operational information stored, transmitted or processed outside Australia | For critical electricity, gas, water and liquid fuel assets, layout diagrams, schematics, configuration information and other data a reasonable person would consider confidential or sensitive about the asset are sensitive operational information. Storing, transmitting or processing them in a model, index or log store outside Australia is a material risk your CIRMP has to identify and, as far as reasonably practicable, minimise or eliminate. | Every step we build, including model inference, is designed to run in an Australian region. Inside a platform you already license, we show you where the vendor runs it. | A data-flow map showing where each step runs | Source, as at 10 June 2026 |
| CIRMP Rules s 8A(2)(c)–(d): risks from advanced, novel or emerging technology | The Rules don't define the term; the Explanatory Statement says it captures technology such as AI. Deploying or hosting AI in a way that could prejudice the asset's availability, integrity, reliability or confidentiality is a material risk the CIRMP has to minimise or eliminate, so far as reasonably practicable. For assets that were CI assets before 10 June 2026, Home Affairs gives 10 June 2027 as the date to comply by. | What we build reads your documents without changing them, anything it drafts waits for a person, and it is re-tested when the model changes. | A test report listing every failure, and each re-test record | Source, as at 10 June 2026 |
| Coal Mining Safety and Health Regulation 2017 (Qld) s 11: current SOPs easily accessible | A Queensland coal mine's site senior executive must keep a list of current SOPs, and the current SOP for each activity, easily accessible to the workers doing it, in a format that's easy to use and understand. An assistant that answers from a superseded SOP works against that, and it doesn't replace the list or the copy. | The assistant answers only from SOPs marked current, shows the version it used, and says so when the SOP is silent. | A test report and the list of SOP versions indexed | Source, as at 1 September 2026 |
| Mining and Quarrying Safety and Health Regulation 2017 (Qld) s 115: only current procedures in use | At a Queensland mine or quarry other than a coal mine, the site senior executive must control the issue and availability of written procedures and standard work instructions so only current versions are in use, and make copies of the current ones available to the workers they apply to. An assistant that answers from a superseded version works against that. | The assistant answers only from current versions, drops superseded ones, and shows the version number and issue date it used. | A test report and a log of versions indexed and removed | Source, as at 27 March 2026 |
Last reviewed
General information, not legal advice.
An illustrative scenario: a made-up water utility tests a procedures assistant on its crews' questions and maps where schematics would go under the CIRMP Rules.
Let’s discuss your workflow.
Talk to us about AI for resources & energy